Celeron Dual-Core T1700 vs A8-7650K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7650K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.97
+194%
Celeron Dual-Core T1700
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.67

A8-7650K outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1700 by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7650K and Celeron Dual-Core T1700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19442750
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.31no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency1.961.81
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date7 January 2015 (9 years ago)7 December 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$152no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-7650K and Celeron Dual-Core T1700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size245 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A8-7650K and Celeron Dual-Core T1700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2+PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7650K and Celeron Dual-Core T1700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE1-4a, AVX, AES, FMA4, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7650K and Celeron Dual-Core T1700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7650K and Celeron Dual-Core T1700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7650K and Celeron Dual-Core T1700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7650K and Celeron Dual-Core T1700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7650K and Celeron Dual-Core T1700.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7650K 1.97
+194%
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 0.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7650K 3132
+196%
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 1058

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A8-7650K 2904
+65.9%
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 1750

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A8-7650K 9456
+189%
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 3270

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A8-7650K 4410
+203%
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 1456

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.97 0.67
Recency 7 January 2015 7 December 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

A8-7650K has a 194% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.

The A8-7650K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 in performance tests.

Note that A8-7650K is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7650K and Celeron Dual-Core T1700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7650K
A8-7650K
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Celeron Dual-Core T1700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 191 vote

Rate A8-7650K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7650K or Celeron Dual-Core T1700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.