N100 vs A8-7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7600
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.03

N100 outperforms A8-7600 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7600 and N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19091538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency2.9654.57
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)no data
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-7600 and N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cacheno data6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C105 °C
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A8-7600 and N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7600 and N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+

Security technologies

A8-7600 and N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7600 and N100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7600 and N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Quick Sync Video-+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7600 and N100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A8-7600 and N100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7600 and N100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212.1
OpenGLno data4.6
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7600 and N100.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes169
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7600 2.03
N100 3.46
+70.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7600 3219
N100 5497
+70.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 3.46
Recency 31 July 2014 1 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

N100 has a 70.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7600 in performance tests.

Note that A8-7600 is a desktop processor while N100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7600 and N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7600
A8-7600
Intel N100
N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 332 votes

Rate A8-7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 183 votes

Rate N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7600 or N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.