Sempron 3850 vs A8-7410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7410
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.73
+137%
Sempron 3850
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.73

A8-7410 outperforms Sempron 3850 by a whopping 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7410 and Sempron 3850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20452691
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency6.552.76
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-7410 and Sempron 3850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache2048 KB2048 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A8-7410 and Sempron 3850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM1
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 25 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7410 and Sempron 3850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-Vno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7410 and Sempron 3850 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7410 and Sempron 3850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR3-1600
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data128
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7410 and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7410 and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7410 and Sempron 3850.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7410 1.73
+137%
Sempron 3850 0.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7410 2741
+137%
Sempron 3850 1156

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-7410 241
+50.6%
Sempron 3850 160

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-7410 627
+17.2%
Sempron 3850 535

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.73 0.73
Recency 7 May 2015 9 April 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 25 Watt

A8-7410 has a 137% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

The A8-7410 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3850 in performance tests.

Be aware that A8-7410 is a notebook processor while Sempron 3850 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7410 and Sempron 3850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7410
A8-7410
AMD Sempron 3850
Sempron 3850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 704 votes

Rate A8-7410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate Sempron 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7410 or Sempron 3850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.