EPYC 7452 vs A8-7410

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7410
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.73
EPYC 7452
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 155 Watt
28.33
+1538%

EPYC 7452 outperforms A8-7410 by a whopping 1538% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7410 and EPYC 7452 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2045164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.95
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiency6.5117.21
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,025

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-7410 and EPYC 7452 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.35 GHz
Multiplierno data23.5
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A8-7410 and EPYC 7452 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFP4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 25 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7410 and EPYC 7452. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-Vno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7410 and EPYC 7452 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7410 and EPYC 7452. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels18
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7410 and EPYC 7452 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7410 and EPYC 7452 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7410 and EPYC 7452.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7410 1.73
EPYC 7452 28.33
+1538%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7410 2741
EPYC 7452 44996
+1542%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-7410 241
EPYC 7452 1075
+346%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-7410 627
EPYC 7452 8215
+1210%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.73 28.33
Recency 7 May 2015 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 155 Watt

A8-7410 has 1191.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7452, on the other hand, has a 1537.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7452 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7410 in performance tests.

Be aware that A8-7410 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7452 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7410 and EPYC 7452, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7410
A8-7410
AMD EPYC 7452
EPYC 7452

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 703 votes

Rate A8-7410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 71 vote

Rate EPYC 7452 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7410 or EPYC 7452, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.