Ryzen 7 4980U vs A8-7100
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 4980U outperforms A8-7100 by a whopping 964% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A8-7100 and Ryzen 7 4980U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2457 | 713 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Kaveri | AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | 5.13 | 69.19 |
| Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) |
| Release date | 4 June 2014 (10 years ago) | 13 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A8-7100 and Ryzen 7 4980U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 20 |
| L1 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 245 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2410 Million | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A8-7100 and Ryzen 7 4980U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP3 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7100 and Ryzen 7 4980U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| Out-of-band client management | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| HSA | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7100 and Ryzen 7 4980U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7100 and Ryzen 7 4980U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 68.27 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1950 MHz) |
| iGPU core count | 4 | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8-7100 and Ryzen 7 4980U integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A8-7100 and Ryzen 7 4980U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7100 and Ryzen 7 4980U.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.03 | 10.96 |
| Recency | 4 June 2014 | 13 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 4980U has a 964.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 26.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 7 4980U is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7100 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7100 and Ryzen 7 4980U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
