Pentium M 705 vs A8-7100

VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-7100 and Pentium M 705 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2438not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriPentium M
Power efficiency5.13no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Banias (2003)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-7100 and Pentium M 705 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography28 nm130 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2410 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.956V-1.484V

Compatibility

Information on A8-7100 and Pentium M 705 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP3H-PBGA479, PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt24.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7100 and Pentium M 705. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A8-7100 and Pentium M 705 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7100 and Pentium M 705 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7100 and Pentium M 705. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count4no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7100 and Pentium M 705 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7100 and Pentium M 705 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7100 and Pentium M 705.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A8-7100 33.23
+255%
Pentium M 705 118

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 24 Watt

A8-7100 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 26.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A8-7100 and Pentium M 705. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7100 and Pentium M 705, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7100
A8-7100
Intel Pentium M 705
Pentium M 705

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 30 votes

Rate A8-7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium M 705 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7100 or Pentium M 705, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.