Core i5-12400 vs A8-6500
Aggregate performance score
i5-12400 outperforms A8-6500 by a whopping 588% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A8-6500 and Core i5-12400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1951 | 588 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 69 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.34 | 68.27 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Richland (2013−2014) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 1 June 2013 (11 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i5-12400 has 19979% better value for money than A8-6500.
Detailed specifications
A8-6500 and Core i5-12400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 18 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on A8-6500 and Core i5-12400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM2 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6500 and Core i5-12400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
A8-6500 and Core i5-12400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6500 and Core i5-12400 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6500 and Core i5-12400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 76.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 8570D | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6500 and Core i5-12400.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i5-12400 outperforms A8-6500 by 588% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 65%
Core i5-12400 outperforms A8-6500 by 588% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 40%
Core i5-12400 outperforms A8-6500 by 397% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 40%
Core i5-12400 outperforms A8-6500 by 746% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.82 | 12.53 |
| Recency | 1 June 2013 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
i5-12400 has a 588.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i5-12400 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-6500 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6500 and Core i5-12400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
