Celeron 7305 vs A8-6500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-6500
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.78
+14.1%
Celeron 7305
2022
5 cores / 5 threads, 15 Watt
1.56

A8-6500 outperforms Celeron 7305 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6500 and Celeron 7305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20272123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency2.599.84
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Alder Lake-U (2022)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)23 February 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-6500 and Celeron 7305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads45
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz1.1 GHz
L1 cache192 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A8-6500 and Celeron 7305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6500 and Celeron 7305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A8-6500 and Celeron 7305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6500 and Celeron 7305 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6500 and Celeron 7305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8570DIntel UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel Processors
จำนวนพาธไลน์256no data
Quick Sync Video-+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6500 and Celeron 7305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A8-6500 and Celeron 7305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6500 and Celeron 7305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1112.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6500 and Celeron 7305.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6500 1.78
+14.1%
Celeron 7305 1.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-6500 2824
+14.3%
Celeron 7305 2471

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.78 1.56
Integrated graphics card 1.13 5.58
Recency 1 June 2013 23 February 2022
Physical cores 4 5
Threads 4 5
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

A8-6500 has a 14.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 7305, on the other hand, has 393.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The A8-6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 7305 in performance tests.

Note that A8-6500 is a desktop processor while Celeron 7305 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6500 and Celeron 7305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6500
A8-6500
Intel Celeron 7305
Celeron 7305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 108 votes

Rate A8-6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 143 votes

Rate Celeron 7305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6500 or Celeron 7305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.