Pentium M 765 vs A8-6410
Primary details
Comparing A8-6410 and Pentium M 765 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2309 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | Pentium M |
| Architecture codename | Beema (2014) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 1 June 2014 (10 years ago) | October 2004 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A8-6410 and Pentium M 765 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 84 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 930 Million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on A8-6410 and Pentium M 765 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA769 | 479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6410 and Pentium M 765. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6410 and Pentium M 765. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A8-6410 outperforms Pentium M 765 by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
A8-6410 outperforms Pentium M 765 by 232% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 21 Watt |
A8-6410 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A8-6410 and Pentium M 765. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6410 and Pentium M 765, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
