Atom 230 vs A8-5600K

VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-5600K and Atom 230 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2008not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Intel Atom
Power efficiency1.71no data
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$29

Detailed specifications

A8-5600K and Atom 230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache128K (per core)56 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million47 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on A8-5600K and Atom 230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-5600K and Atom 230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A8-5600K and Atom 230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-5600K and Atom 230 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-5600K and Atom 230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7560D-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-5600K 2857
+1591%
Atom 230 169

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A8-5600K 2941
+428%
Atom 230 557

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A8-5600K 8838
+939%
Atom 230 851

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 2 April 2008
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 4 Watt

A8-5600K has an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom 230, on the other hand, has 2400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A8-5600K and Atom 230. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A8-5600K is a desktop processor while Atom 230 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-5600K and Atom 230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-5600K
A8-5600K
Intel Atom 230
Atom 230

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 380 votes

Rate A8-5600K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 56 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-5600K or Atom 230, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.