Celeron 787 vs A8-5500
Primary details
Comparing A8-5500 and Celeron 787 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2086 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 2.39 | no data |
Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 2 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
A8-5500 and Celeron 787 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 13 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 1.5 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 246 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 504 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A8-5500 and Celeron 787 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | FM2 | FCBGA1023 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-5500 and Celeron 787. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
FMA | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FDI | no data | + |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
A8-5500 and Celeron 787 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-5500 and Celeron 787 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-5500 and Celeron 787. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 7560D | Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 950 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8-5500 and Celeron 787 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
SDVO | no data | + |
CRT | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-5500 and Celeron 787.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 1.19 | 0.77 |
Recency | 2 October 2012 | 1 July 2011 |
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
A8-5500 has 54.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Celeron 787, on the other hand, has 282.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A8-5500 and Celeron 787. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A8-5500 is a desktop processor while Celeron 787 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-5500 and Celeron 787, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.