A10-6790B vs A8-5500
Primary details
Comparing A8-5500 and A10-6790B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2070 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 2.39 | no data |
Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Richland (2013−2014) |
Release date | 2 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 28 October 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A8-5500 and A10-6790B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4096 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 246 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 74 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | 74 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 1,303 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A8-5500 and A10-6790B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FM2 | FM2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-5500 and A10-6790B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
RAID | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-5500 and A10-6790B are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-5500 and A10-6790B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-1866 |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 7560D | AMD Radeon HD 8670D |
Number of pipelines | no data | 384 |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8-5500 and A10-6790B integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A8-5500 and A10-6790B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 11 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-5500 and A10-6790B.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 1.18 | 1.38 |
Recency | 2 October 2012 | 28 October 2013 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
A8-5500 has 53.8% lower power consumption.
A10-6790B, on the other hand, has 16.9% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 1 year.
We couldn't decide between A8-5500 and A10-6790B. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-5500 and A10-6790B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.