Ryzen Threadripper 1977 vs A8-3800
Primary details
Comparing A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2286 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.88 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 30 June 2011 (13 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32768 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM1 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 155 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6550D | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 155 Watt |
A8-3800 has 138.5% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1977, on the other hand, has 250% more physical cores, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
