Celeron G3900TE vs A6-9500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9500
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.18
+1.7%
Celeron G3900TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.16

A6-9500 outperforms Celeron G3900TE by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9500 and Celeron G3900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23542361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.621.35
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.723.14
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)19 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A6-9500 has 94% better value for money than Celeron G3900TE.

Detailed specifications

A6-9500 and Celeron G3900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data23
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9500 and Celeron G3900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4LGA-1151
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9500 and Celeron G3900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9500 and Celeron G3900TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9500 and Celeron G3900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 510
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9500 and Celeron G3900TE integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9500 and Celeron G3900TE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9500 and Celeron G3900TE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9500 1.18
+1.7%
Celeron G3900TE 1.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9500 1869
+1%
Celeron G3900TE 1850

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 1.16
Recency 27 July 2017 19 October 2015
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

A6-9500 has a 1.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Celeron G3900TE, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-9500 and Celeron G3900TE.

Note that A6-9500 is a desktop processor while Celeron G3900TE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9500 and Celeron G3900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9500
A6-9500
Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 184 votes

Rate A6-9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9500 or Celeron G3900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.