Sempron 3500+ vs A6-9225

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9225
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
+460%
Sempron 3500+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.15

A6-9225 outperforms Sempron 3500+ by a whopping 460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9225 and Sempron 3500+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25703311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency5.300.23
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Palermo (2001−2005)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$167

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-9225 and Sempron 3500+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache160 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die size124.5 mm2103 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million63 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and Sempron 3500+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA939
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and Sempron 3500+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and Sempron 3500+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 686 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9225 0.84
+460%
Sempron 3500+ 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9225 1332
+474%
Sempron 3500+ 232

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 0.15
Recency 1 June 2018 1 October 2005
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 62 Watt

A6-9225 has a 460% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 313.3% lower power consumption.

The A6-9225 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3500+ in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-9225 is a notebook processor while Sempron 3500+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and Sempron 3500+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
AMD Sempron 3500+
Sempron 3500+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2292 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate Sempron 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or Sempron 3500+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.