Core 2 Duo T7300 vs A6-9225

Primary details

Comparing A6-9225 and Core 2 Duo T7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2565not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency5.29no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$234

Detailed specifications

A6-9225 and Core 2 Duo T7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache160 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size124.5 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and Core 2 Duo T7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAPBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and Core 2 Duo T7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A6-9225 and Core 2 Duo T7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and Core 2 Duo T7300 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and Core 2 Duo T7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9225 1332
+96.5%
Core 2 Duo T7300 678

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-9225 271
+24.9%
Core 2 Duo T7300 217

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-9225 453
+28.7%
Core 2 Duo T7300 352

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A6-9225 2532
+24.1%
Core 2 Duo T7300 2040

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A6-9225 4193
+12.3%
Core 2 Duo T7300 3733

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A6-9225 2132
+23.3%
Core 2 Duo T7300 1729

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2018 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

A6-9225 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A6-9225 and Core 2 Duo T7300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and Core 2 Duo T7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
Core 2 Duo T7300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2289 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 118 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or Core 2 Duo T7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.