Celeron N3350E vs A6-9225

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-9225 and Celeron N3350E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2568not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency5.28no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)no data
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)1 July 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9225 and Celeron N3350E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache160 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and Celeron N3350E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAno data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and Celeron N3350E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Smart Idleno data-

Security technologies

A6-9225 and Celeron N3350E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and Celeron N3350E are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and Celeron N3350E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)Intel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9225 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9225 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9225 and Celeron N3350E.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.17 0.77
Recency 1 June 2018 1 July 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

A6-9225 has 51.9% faster integrated GPU.

Celeron N3350E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A6-9225 and Celeron N3350E. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and Celeron N3350E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
Intel Celeron N3350E
Celeron N3350E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2289 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron N3350E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or Celeron N3350E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.