Celeron M P4600 vs A6-9225

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9225
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
+50%
Celeron M P4600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.56

A6-9225 outperforms Celeron M P4600 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9225 and Celeron M P4600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25702824
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency5.301.51
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)1 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

A6-9225 and Celeron M P4600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data2500 MHz
L1 cache160 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size124.5 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and Celeron M P4600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGAPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and Celeron M P4600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A6-9225 and Celeron M P4600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and Celeron M P4600 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and Celeron M P4600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9225 0.84
+50%
Celeron M P4600 0.56

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A6-9225 2532
+34.3%
Celeron M P4600 1886

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A6-9225 4193
Celeron M P4600 4213
+0.5%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A6-9225 2132
+18.2%
Celeron M P4600 1804

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A6-9225 26.28
+30.5%
Celeron M P4600 34.29

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A6-9225 1
Celeron M P4600 1
+2.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 0.56
Recency 1 June 2018 1 October 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

A6-9225 has a 50% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The A6-9225 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M P4600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and Celeron M P4600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
Intel Celeron M P4600
Celeron M P4600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2292 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron M P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or Celeron M P4600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.