i3-330E vs A6-9220C

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9220C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.66
Core i3-330E
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.79
+19.7%

Core i3-330E outperforms A6-9220C by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9220C and Core i3-330E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27562624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Core i3
Power efficiency10.362.12
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date7 January 2019 (5 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$177

Detailed specifications

A6-9220C and Core i3-330E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier1816
L1 cache160 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cacheno data3 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size124.5 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C for rPGA,105 °C for BGA
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9220C and Core i3-330E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT4BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220C and Core i3-330E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

A6-9220C and Core i3-330E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220C and Core i3-330E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9220C and Core i3-330E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data8.79 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth14.936 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9220C and Core i3-330E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9220C and Core i3-330E.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9220C 0.66
i3-330E 0.79
+19.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9220C 1053
i3-330E 1260
+19.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 0.79
Integrated graphics card 1.48 0.77
Recency 7 January 2019 7 January 2010
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 35 Watt

A6-9220C has 92.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

i3-330E, on the other hand, has a 19.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

The Core i3-330E is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9220C in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9220C and Core i3-330E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9220C
A6-9220C
Intel Core i3-330E
Core i3-330E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 32 votes

Rate A6-9220C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Core i3-330E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9220C or Core i3-330E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.