Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs A6-9220

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9220
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.84
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.35
+418%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms A6-9220 by a whopping 418% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9220 and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25861371
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency5.1126.44
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9220 and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache160 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size124.5 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9220 and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGAFP5
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220 and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220 and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9220 and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9220 and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9220 0.84
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4.35
+418%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9220 1283
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6661
+419%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A6-9220 2432
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4349
+78.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A6-9220 3941
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 14336
+264%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A6-9220 2253
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 5635
+150%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A6-9220 27.71
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 12.36
+124%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A6-9220 1
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6
+341%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A6-9220 112
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 553
+396%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

A6-9220 69
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 134
+95.6%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

A6-9220 0.8
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 1.55
+93.8%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

A6-9220 1
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3.4
+247%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

A6-9220 9
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 34
+290%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

A6-9220 47
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 98
+110%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

A6-9220 770
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2700
+251%

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

A6-9220 2921
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 12422
+325%

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

A6-9220 1798
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3326
+85%

Geekbench 2

A6-9220 3461
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 11156
+222%

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

A6-9220 2805
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 9760
+248%

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

A6-9220 1885
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3480
+84.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 4.35
Integrated graphics card 1.17 4.50
Recency 1 June 2016 26 October 2017
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

A6-9220 has 50% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, on the other hand, has a 417.9% higher aggregate performance score, 284.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9220 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9220 and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9220
A6-9220
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 402 votes

Rate A6-9220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 115 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9220 or Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.