E-350 vs A6-9210

VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-9210 and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2616not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD E-Series
Power efficiency4.98no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9210 and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm40 nm
Die size124.5 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9210 and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FT1
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9210 and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9210 and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9210 and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 6310
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9210 and E-350 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9210 and E-350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9210 and E-350.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9210 1248
+196%
E-350 421

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-9210 332
+213%
E-350 106

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-9210 518
+185%
E-350 182

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 4 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 18 Watt

A6-9210 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A6-9210 and E-350. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9210 and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9210
A6-9210
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 151 vote

Rate A6-9210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 386 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9210 or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.