Celeron M 530 vs A6-8500P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-8500P
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.82
+356%

A6-8500P outperforms Celeron M 530 by a whopping 356% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28043502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoCeleron M
Power efficiency2.320.25
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date3 June 2015 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

A6-8500P and Celeron M 530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L2 cache1024 KBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on A6-8500P and Celeron M 530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-8500P and Celeron M 530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A6-8500P and Celeron M 530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-8500P and Celeron M 530 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-8500P and Celeron M 530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesNot Listedno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count4no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-8500P and Celeron M 530 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-8500P and Celeron M 530 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-8500P and Celeron M 530.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-8500P 0.82
+356%
Celeron M 530 0.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-8500P 1445
+352%
Samples: 17
Celeron M 530 320
Samples: 34

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.82 0.18
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt

A6-8500P has a 355.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The AMD A6-8500P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 530 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-8500P
A6-8500P
Intel Celeron M 530
Celeron M 530

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate A6-8500P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 42 votes

Rate Celeron M 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-8500P and Celeron M 530, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.