Processor N200 vs A6-7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-7000
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.66
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.62
+145%

Processor N200 outperforms A6-7000 by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-7000 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27562102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency3.5424.62
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date1 June 2014 (10 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

A6-7000 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.2 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-7000 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7000 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A6-7000 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7000 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7000 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7000 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7000 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7000 and Processor N200.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 1.62
Recency 1 June 2014 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N200 has a 145.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 183.3% lower power consumption.

The Processor N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-7000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7000 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7000
A6-7000
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 14 votes

Rate A6-7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 141 vote

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7000 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.