Atom x5-Z8350 vs A6-7000

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-7000
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.66
+13.8%

A6-7000 outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-7000 and Atom x5-Z8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27532815
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Kaveri5x Intel Atom
Power efficiency3.54no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release date1 June 2014 (10 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-7000 and Atom x5-Z8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.92 GHz
L2 cache1024 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-7000 and Atom x5-Z8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT3UTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)17 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7000 and Atom x5-Z8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

A6-7000 and Atom x5-Z8350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7000 and Atom x5-Z8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7000 and Atom x5-Z8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR34 GB
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics
iGPU core count3no data
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7000 and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A6-7000 and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7000 and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7000 and Atom x5-Z8350.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data1
USB revisionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-7000 0.66
+13.8%
Atom x5-Z8350 0.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-7000 1010
+13.4%
Atom x5-Z8350 891

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 0.58
Recency 1 June 2014 8 February 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

A6-7000 has a 13.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom x5-Z8350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The A6-7000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7000 and Atom x5-Z8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7000
A6-7000
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 14 votes

Rate A6-7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 374 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7000 or Atom x5-Z8350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.