VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 vs A6-6400K

VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-6400K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2503not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)VIA
Power efficiency1.38no data
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)CNQ (2011)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)17 May 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-6400K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.9 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz1.46 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cache96 KB512 KB
L2 cache1024 KB4 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size246 mm2132 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A6-6400K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2BGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt27.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-6400K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE1-4a, AES, ABM, AVX, BMI1, AMD64, VT, EVP, Turbo Core 3.0no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-6400K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-6400K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8470Dno data
Number of pipelines192no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-6400K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-6400K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-6400K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A6-6400K 2654
+64.3%
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 1615

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2013 17 May 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 27 Watt

A6-6400K has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 140.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A6-6400K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A6-6400K is a desktop processor while VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-6400K and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-6400K
A6-6400K
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 170 votes

Rate A6-6400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-6400K or VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.