Processor U300 vs A6-6400K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-6400K and Processor U300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2503not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Intel Raptor Lake-U
Power efficiency1.38no data
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Raptor Lake-U (2023)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

A6-6400K and Processor U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speed3.9 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data55 MHz
L1 cache96 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A6-6400K and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-6400K and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE1-4a, AES, ABM, AVX, BMI1, AMD64, VT, EVP, Turbo Core 3.0no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A6-6400K and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-6400K and Processor U300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-6400K and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8470DIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz)
Number of pipelines192no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-6400K and Processor U300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-6400K and Processor U300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-6400K and Processor U300.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.97 4.55
Recency 1 June 2013 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 5
Threads 2 6
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Processor U300 has 369.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 150% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A6-6400K and Processor U300. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A6-6400K is a desktop processor while Processor U300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-6400K and Processor U300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-6400K
A6-6400K
Intel Processor U300
Processor U300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 171 vote

Rate A6-6400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 12 votes

Rate Processor U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-6400K or Processor U300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.