Duo T2500 vs A6-6310

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-6310
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.05
+304%
Core Duo T2500
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.26

A6-6310 outperforms Core Duo T2500 by a whopping 304% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-6310 and Core Duo T2500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24353155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesCore Duo
Power efficiency6.620.79
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$120

Detailed specifications

A6-6310 and Core Duo T2500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cacheno data0 KB
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm290 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors930 Million151 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.1625V - 1.3V

Compatibility

Information on A6-6310 and Core Duo T2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bPBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-6310 and Core Duo T2500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A6-6310 and Core Duo T2500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-6310 and Core Duo T2500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-6310 and Core Duo T2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1865DDR1
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-6310 and Core Duo T2500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-6310 and Core Duo T2500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-6310 and Core Duo T2500.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-6310 1.05
+304%
Duo T2500 0.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-6310 1675
+311%
Duo T2500 408

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A6-6310 2730
+68.4%
Duo T2500 1621

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.05 0.26
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 31 Watt

A6-6310 has a 303.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.

The A6-6310 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Duo T2500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-6310 and Core Duo T2500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-6310
A6-6310
Intel Core Duo T2500
Core Duo T2500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 243 votes

Rate A6-6310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 16 votes

Rate Core Duo T2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-6310 or Core Duo T2500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.