Phenom II X3 N870 vs A6-5200

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5200
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.07
Phenom II X3 N870
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 35 Watt
1.08
+0.9%

Phenom II X3 N870 outperforms A6-5200 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-5200 and Phenom II X3 N870 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24222418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series3x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency3.982.87
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)16 December 2010 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-5200 and Phenom II X3 N870 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads43
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
L1 cache256 KB384 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-5200 and Phenom II X3 N870 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3S1 (S1g4)
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5200 and Phenom II X3 N870. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5200 and Phenom II X3 N870 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5200 and Phenom II X3 N870. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8400no data
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5200 and Phenom II X3 N870 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5200 and Phenom II X3 N870 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5200 and Phenom II X3 N870.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-5200 1.07
Phenom II X3 N870 1.08
+0.9%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A6-5200 2
Phenom II X3 N870 2
+3.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.07 1.08
Recency 23 May 2013 16 December 2010
Physical cores 4 3
Threads 4 3
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

A6-5200 has an age advantage of 2 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X3 N870, on the other hand, has a 0.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-5200 and Phenom II X3 N870.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5200 and Phenom II X3 N870, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5200
A6-5200
AMD Phenom II X3 N870
Phenom II X3 N870

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 210 votes

Rate A6-5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 33 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5200 or Phenom II X3 N870, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.