A4-9120 vs A6-5200

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5200
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.09
+36.3%

A6-5200 outperforms A4-9120 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-5200 and A4-9120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24192633
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesBristol Ridge
Power efficiency3.984.86
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-5200 and A4-9120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache256 KB160 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-5200 and A4-9120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3BGA
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5200 and A4-9120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXVirtualization,
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5200 and A4-9120 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5200 and A4-9120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR4
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8400AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5200 and A4-9120 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5200 and A4-9120 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5200 and A4-9120.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-5200 1.09
+36.3%
A4-9120 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-5200 1663
+36.6%
A4-9120 1217

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 0.80
Integrated graphics card 0.69 1.03
Recency 23 May 2013 1 June 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

A6-5200 has a 36.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A4-9120, on the other hand, has 49.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, and 150% lower power consumption.

The A6-5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5200 and A4-9120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5200
A6-5200
AMD A4-9120
A4-9120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 210 votes

Rate A6-5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 491 vote

Rate A4-9120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5200 or A4-9120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.