EPYC 7413 vs A6-4400M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-4400M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.64
EPYC 7413
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
31.62
+4841%

EPYC 7413 outperforms A6-4400M by a whopping 4841% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-4400M and EPYC 7413 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2775132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.68
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.7316.61
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-4400M and EPYC 7413 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplierno data26.5
L1 cache96 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size246 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-4400M and EPYC 7413 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFS1r2SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-4400M and EPYC 7413. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-4400M and EPYC 7413 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-4400M and EPYC 7413. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7520G (496 - 685 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-4400M and EPYC 7413.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-4400M 0.64
EPYC 7413 31.62
+4841%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-4400M 1013
EPYC 7413 50223
+4858%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-4400M 314
EPYC 7413 1538
+390%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-4400M 398
EPYC 7413 12804
+3117%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 31.62
Recency 15 May 2012 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 180 Watt

A6-4400M has 414.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7413, on the other hand, has a 4840.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7413 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-4400M in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-4400M is a notebook processor while EPYC 7413 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-4400M and EPYC 7413, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-4400M
A6-4400M
AMD EPYC 7413
EPYC 7413

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 188 votes

Rate A6-4400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7413 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-4400M or EPYC 7413, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.