E1-6010 vs A6-3670K
Primary details
Comparing A6-3670K and E1-6010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD E-Series |
Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Beema (2014) |
Release date | 20 December 2011 (12 years ago) | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-3670K and E1-6010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.35 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1024 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 228 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 90 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on A6-3670K and E1-6010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FM1 | FT3b |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3670K and E1-6010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | FMA4 |
AVX | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3670K and E1-6010 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3670K and E1-6010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Radeon HD 6530D | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A6-3670K and E1-6010 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A6-3670K and E1-6010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3670K and E1-6010.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 20 December 2011 | 29 April 2014 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 10 Watt |
A6-3670K has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
E1-6010, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A6-3670K and E1-6010. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A6-3670K is a desktop processor while E1-6010 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3670K and E1-6010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.