V-Series V105 vs A6-3500
Aggregate performance score
A6-3500 outperforms V-Series V105 by a whopping 536% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A6-3500 and V-Series V105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2553 | 3337 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD V-Series |
| Power efficiency | 1.29 | 1.47 |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | no data |
| Release date | 17 August 2011 (13 years ago) | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-3500 and V-Series V105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 2000 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A6-3500 and V-Series V105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM1 | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3500 and V-Series V105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3500 and V-Series V105 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3500 and V-Series V105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon HD 6530D | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.89 | 0.14 |
| Recency | 17 August 2011 | 12 May 2010 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 1 |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 9 Watt |
A6-3500 has a 535.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
V-Series V105, on the other hand, has 622.2% lower power consumption.
The A6-3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the V-Series V105 in performance tests.
Note that A6-3500 is a desktop processor while V-Series V105 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3500 and V-Series V105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
