Celeron N3160 vs A6-3410MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3410MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.82
+7.9%

A6-3410MX outperforms Celeron N3160 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3410MX and Celeron N3160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25372587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)15 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

A6-3410MX and Celeron N3160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache4 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size218 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-3410MX and Celeron N3160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFS1FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3410MX and Celeron N3160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480Gno data
AES-NIno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3410MX and Celeron N3160 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3410MX and Celeron N3160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6520GIntel HD Graphics (Braswell)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3410MX and Celeron N3160.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3410MX 0.82
+7.9%
Celeron N3160 0.76

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-3410MX 1263
+6.9%
Celeron N3160 1182

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-3410MX 225
+33.9%
Celeron N3160 168

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-3410MX 637
+27.1%
Celeron N3160 501

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.82 0.76
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.62
Recency 14 June 2011 15 January 2016
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 4 Watt

A6-3410MX has a 7.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 24.2% faster integrated GPU.

Celeron N3160, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1025% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-3410MX and Celeron N3160.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3410MX and Celeron N3160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3410MX
A6-3410MX
Intel Celeron N3160
Celeron N3160

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 43 votes

Rate A6-3410MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 194 votes

Rate Celeron N3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3410MX or Celeron N3160, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.