Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U vs A6-3400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3400M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.77
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
9.63
+1151%

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U outperforms A6-3400M by a whopping 1151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2610784
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesCezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Cezanne-U PRO (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date15 June 2011 (13 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache128 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache4 MB3 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size218 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1000 Million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480GPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6520GAMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3400M 0.77
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 9.63
+1151%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-3400M 1191
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 14902
+1151%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-3400M 213
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 1622
+662%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-3400M 513
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 5562
+984%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A6-3400M 1512
+67400%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 2

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A6-3400M 4922
+39371%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 12

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A6-3400M 2135
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 11124
+421%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A6-3400M 26
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 8.21
+217%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A6-3400M 2
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U 14
+697%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 9.63
Integrated graphics card 0.77 7.40
Recency 15 June 2011 16 March 2021
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U has a 1150.6% higher aggregate performance score, 861% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3400M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3400M
A6-3400M
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 169 votes

Rate A6-3400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 123 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3400M or Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.