Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs A6-1450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-1450
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.67
+55.8%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43

A6-1450 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-1450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27452974
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency4.231.16
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Merom-2M (2008)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-1450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-1450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3P
Power consumption (TDP)8 - 15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-1450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-1450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-1450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8250 (300 - 400 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-1450 0.67
+55.8%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 0.43

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A6-1450 2861
+5%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 2725

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A6-1450 60
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 47
+27.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 0.43
Recency 23 May 2013 1 May 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 35 Watt

A6-1450 has a 55.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 337.5% lower power consumption.

The A6-1450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-1450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-1450
A6-1450
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 38 votes

Rate A6-1450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 285 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-1450 or Celeron Dual-Core T1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.