Xeon D-1813NT vs A4 PRO-7300B

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4 PRO-7300B
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.92
Xeon D-1813NT
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 42 Watt
4.87
+429%

Xeon D-1813NT outperforms A4 PRO-7300B by a whopping 429% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4 PRO-7300B and Xeon D-1813NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25341249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.3410.97
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)no data
Release dateAugust 2014 (10 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A4 PRO-7300B and Xeon D-1813NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Threads28
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache96 KBno data
L2 cache1024 KBno data
L3 cacheno data10240 KB
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A4 PRO-7300B and Xeon D-1813NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt42 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4 PRO-7300B and Xeon D-1813NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A4 PRO-7300B and Xeon D-1813NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4 PRO-7300B and Xeon D-1813NT are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4 PRO-7300B and Xeon D-1813NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8470Dno data
จำนวนพาธไลน์192no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4 PRO-7300B and Xeon D-1813NT integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4 PRO-7300B and Xeon D-1813NT integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4 PRO-7300B and Xeon D-1813NT.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4 PRO-7300B 0.92
Xeon D-1813NT 4.87
+429%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4 PRO-7300B 1458
Xeon D-1813NT 7732
+430%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.92 4.87
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 42 Watt

Xeon D-1813NT has a 429.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 54.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon D-1813NT is our recommended choice as it beats the A4 PRO-7300B in performance tests.

Note that A4 PRO-7300B is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1813NT is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4 PRO-7300B and Xeon D-1813NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4 PRO-7300B
A4 PRO-7300B
Intel Xeon D-1813NT
Xeon D-1813NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 37 votes

Rate A4 PRO-7300B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1813NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4 PRO-7300B or Xeon D-1813NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.