i3-2367M vs A4-9120

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-9120
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.77
+45.3%
Core i3-2367M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.53

A4-9120 outperforms Core i3-2367M by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-9120 and Core i3-2367M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26362843
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeIntel Core i3
Power efficiency4.862.95
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$250

Detailed specifications

A4-9120 and Core i3-2367M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cache160 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size124.5 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million624 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-9120 and Core i3-2367M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGAFCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-9120 and Core i3-2367M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,Intel® AVX
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

A4-9120 and Core i3-2367M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-9120 and Core i3-2367M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-9120 and Core i3-2367M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)Intel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-9120 and Core i3-2367M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-9120 and Core i3-2367M.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-9120 0.77
+45.3%
i3-2367M 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-9120 1217
+43.7%
i3-2367M 847

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 0.53
Integrated graphics card 1.03 0.66
Recency 1 June 2017 1 October 2011
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 17 Watt

A4-9120 has a 45.3% higher aggregate performance score, 56.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

i3-2367M, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The A4-9120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2367M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-9120 and Core i3-2367M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-9120
A4-9120
Intel Core i3-2367M
Core i3-2367M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 495 votes

Rate A4-9120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 43 votes

Rate Core i3-2367M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-9120 or Core i3-2367M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.