Athlon 64 2800+ vs A4-7210

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-7210
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.04
+447%
Athlon 64 2800+
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.19

A4-7210 outperforms Athlon 64 2800+ by a whopping 447% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-7210 and Athlon 64 2800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24443255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency3.940.20
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)NewCastle (2004)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)April 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$100

Detailed specifications

A4-7210 and Athlon 64 2800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data193 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million69 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-7210 and Athlon 64 2800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3b754
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-7210 and Athlon 64 2800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-7210 and Athlon 64 2800+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-7210 and Athlon 64 2800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R3 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-7210 and Athlon 64 2800+ integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-7210 and Athlon 64 2800+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-7210 and Athlon 64 2800+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-7210 1.04
+447%
Athlon 64 2800+ 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-7210 1656
+461%
Athlon 64 2800+ 295

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 0.19
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 89 Watt

A4-7210 has a 447.4% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 641.7% lower power consumption.

The A4-7210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 2800+ in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-7210 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 2800+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-7210 and Athlon 64 2800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-7210
A4-7210
AMD Athlon 64 2800+
Athlon 64 2800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 161 vote

Rate A4-7210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 36 votes

Rate Athlon 64 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-7210 or Athlon 64 2800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.