Celeron E3200 vs A4-6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6300
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.90
+69.8%
Celeron E3200
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.53

A4-6300 outperforms Celeron E3200 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6300 and Celeron E3200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25352853
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.88
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.310.77
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)30 August 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$52

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-6300 and Celeron E3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache96 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on A4-6300 and Celeron E3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6300 and Celeron E3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A4-6300 and Celeron E3200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6300 and Celeron E3200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6300 and Celeron E3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8370DOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6300 and Celeron E3200 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6300 and Celeron E3200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6300 and Celeron E3200.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6300 0.90
+69.8%
Celeron E3200 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6300 1426
+70%
Celeron E3200 839

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.90 0.53
Recency 1 June 2013 30 August 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

A4-6300 has a 69.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The A4-6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6300 and Celeron E3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6300
A4-6300
Intel Celeron E3200
Celeron E3200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 281 vote

Rate A4-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 76 votes

Rate Celeron E3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6300 or Celeron E3200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.