Celeron 3765U vs A4-6300

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6300
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.90
+13.9%
Celeron 3765U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.79

A4-6300 outperforms Celeron 3765U by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6300 and Celeron 3765U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25352615
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.314.98
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

A4-6300 and Celeron 3765U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.7 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache96 KB128 KB
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-6300 and Celeron 3765U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6300 and Celeron 3765U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

A4-6300 and Celeron 3765U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6300 and Celeron 3765U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6300 and Celeron 3765U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8370DIntel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel Processors
Number of pipelines128no data
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6300 and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6300 and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1111.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6300 and Celeron 3765U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6300 0.90
+13.9%
Celeron 3765U 0.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6300 1426
+13.9%
Celeron 3765U 1252

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.90 0.79
Recency 1 June 2013 1 June 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

A4-6300 has a 13.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 3765U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The A4-6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3765U in performance tests.

Note that A4-6300 is a desktop processor while Celeron 3765U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6300 and Celeron 3765U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6300
A4-6300
Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 281 vote

Rate A4-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6300 or Celeron 3765U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.