Xeon W-1390 vs A4-6210

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6210
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.94
Xeon W-1390
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
15.05
+1501%

Xeon W-1390 outperforms A4-6210 by a whopping 1501% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6210 and Xeon W-1390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2524470
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data64.71
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency5.9317.80
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$494

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-6210 and Xeon W-1390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data276 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A4-6210 and Xeon W-1390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bFCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6210 and Xeon W-1390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A4-6210 and Xeon W-1390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6210 and Xeon W-1390 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6210 and Xeon W-1390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1599DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics P750
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6210 and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A4-6210 and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6210 and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212.1
OpenGLno data4.5
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6210 and Xeon W-1390.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6210 0.94
Xeon W-1390 15.05
+1501%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6210 1495
Xeon W-1390 23902
+1499%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.94 15.05
Recency 29 April 2014 6 May 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

A4-6210 has 433.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-1390, on the other hand, has a 1501.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-1390 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6210 in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-6210 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-1390 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6210 and Xeon W-1390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6210
A4-6210
Intel Xeon W-1390
Xeon W-1390

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 161 vote

Rate A4-6210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-1390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6210 or Xeon W-1390, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.