Atom Z3735G vs A4-6210

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6210
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.94
+91.8%
Atom Z3735G
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.49

A4-6210 outperforms Atom Z3735G by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6210 and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25082891
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency5.9323.19
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$17

Detailed specifications

A4-6210 and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data112 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A4-6210 and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bUTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6210 and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A4-6210 and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6210 and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6210 and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1599DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data1 GB
Max memory channels11
Maximum memory bandwidthno data5.3 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data646 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6210 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6210 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6210 and Atom Z3735G.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6210 0.94
+91.8%
Atom Z3735G 0.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6210 1493
+93.4%
Atom Z3735G 772

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A4-6210 1374
+45.2%
Atom Z3735G 946

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A4-6210 4285
+48.2%
Atom Z3735G 2891

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A4-6210 2398
+57.1%
Atom Z3735G 1526

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A4-6210 34.05
+10.2%
Atom Z3735G 37.53

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

A4-6210 1
+61.3%
Atom Z3735G 0.6

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

A4-6210 10
+52.5%
Atom Z3735G 7

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

A4-6210 47
+47%
Atom Z3735G 32

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

A4-6210 992
Atom Z3735G 1397
+40.8%

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

A4-6210 3160
+49.8%
Atom Z3735G 2110

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

A4-6210 1001
+38.2%
Atom Z3735G 724

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.94 0.49
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 2 Watt

A4-6210 has a 91.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom Z3735G, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

The A4-6210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3735G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6210 and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6210
A4-6210
Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 152 votes

Rate A4-6210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 66 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6210 or Atom Z3735G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.