Core 2 Duo E7600 vs A4-5100

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5100
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.85
+18.1%
Core 2 Duo E7600
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.72

A4-5100 outperforms Core 2 Duo E7600 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-5100 and Core 2 Duo E7600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25792695
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency5.361.05
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date4 November 2013 (11 years ago)10 May 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-5100 and Core 2 Duo E7600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed1.55 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB3 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm282 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C74 °C
Number of transistorsno data228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on A4-5100 and Core 2 Duo E7600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5100 and Core 2 Duo E7600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A4-5100 and Core 2 Duo E7600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5100 and Core 2 Duo E7600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5100 and Core 2 Duo E7600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8330On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-5100 and Core 2 Duo E7600 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-5100 and Core 2 Duo E7600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5100 and Core 2 Duo E7600.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-5100 0.85
+18.1%
Core 2 Duo E7600 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-5100 1346
+17%
Core 2 Duo E7600 1150

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 0.72
Recency 4 November 2013 10 May 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

A4-5100 has a 18.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The A4-5100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E7600 in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-5100 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Duo E7600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5100 and Core 2 Duo E7600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5100
A4-5100
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
Core 2 Duo E7600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 19 votes

Rate A4-5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 92 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5100 or Core 2 Duo E7600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.