Xeon W-3365 vs A4-5000

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5000
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.81
Xeon W-3365
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
37.17
+4489%

Xeon W-3365 outperforms A4-5000 by a whopping 4489% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-5000 and Xeon W-3365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking259088
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency5.1113.03
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-5000 and Xeon W-3365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C81 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A4-5000 and Xeon W-3365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5000 and Xeon W-3365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A4-5000 and Xeon W-3365 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5000 and Xeon W-3365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5000 and Xeon W-3365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channels18
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8330no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-5000 and Xeon W-3365 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-5000 and Xeon W-3365 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5000 and Xeon W-3365.

PCIe version2.04
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-5000 0.81
Xeon W-3365 37.17
+4489%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-5000 1289
Xeon W-3365 59038
+4480%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 37.17
Recency 23 May 2013 29 July 2021
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 270 Watt

A4-5000 has 1700% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3365, on the other hand, has a 4488.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3365 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-5000 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3365 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5000 and Xeon W-3365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5000
A4-5000
Intel Xeon W-3365
Xeon W-3365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 371 vote

Rate A4-5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5000 or Xeon W-3365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.