Celeron G1610T vs A4-5000

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5000
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.81
Celeron G1610T
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.84
+3.7%

Celeron G1610T outperforms A4-5000 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-5000 and Celeron G1610T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26072593
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.67
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency5.112.27
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)3 December 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-5000 and Celeron G1610T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm294 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C65 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-5000 and Celeron G1610T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5000 and Celeron G1610T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A4-5000 and Celeron G1610T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5000 and Celeron G1610T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5000 and Celeron G1610T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8330Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-5000 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-5000 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5000 and Celeron G1610T.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-5000 0.81
Celeron G1610T 0.84
+3.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-5000 1292
Celeron G1610T 1327
+2.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-5000 157
Celeron G1610T 329
+110%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-5000 467
Celeron G1610T 582
+24.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 0.84
Integrated graphics card 0.69 0.77
Recency 23 May 2013 3 December 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

A4-5000 has an age advantage of 5 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron G1610T, on the other hand, has a 3.7% higher aggregate performance score, 11.6% faster integrated GPU, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A4-5000 and Celeron G1610T.

Be aware that A4-5000 is a notebook processor while Celeron G1610T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5000 and Celeron G1610T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5000
A4-5000
Intel Celeron G1610T
Celeron G1610T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 372 votes

Rate A4-5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Celeron G1610T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5000 or Celeron G1610T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.