Celeron P4500 vs A4-4355M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-4355M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.53
Celeron P4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.55
+3.8%

Celeron P4500 outperforms A4-4355M by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-4355M and Celeron P4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28682839
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.841.43
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date27 September 2012 (12 years ago)28 March 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-4355M and Celeron P4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cache96 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-4355M and Celeron P4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP2PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-4355M and Celeron P4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

A4-4355M and Celeron P4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-4355M and Celeron P4500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-4355M and Celeron P4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7400GIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-4355M and Celeron P4500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-4355M and Celeron P4500.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-4355M 0.53
Celeron P4500 0.55
+3.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-4355M 806
Celeron P4500 848
+5.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 0.55
Recency 27 September 2012 28 March 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

A4-4355M has an age advantage of 2 years, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

Celeron P4500, on the other hand, has a 3.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A4-4355M and Celeron P4500.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-4355M and Celeron P4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-4355M
A4-4355M
Intel Celeron P4500
Celeron P4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate A4-4355M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 8 votes

Rate Celeron P4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-4355M or Celeron P4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.