Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs A4-3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3400
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.69
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
15.97
+2214%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms A4-3400 by a whopping 2214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2732424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.60
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency1.008.39
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)ZEN+ (2018−2019)
Release date7 September 2011 (13 years ago)3 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size228 mm2213 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A4-3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM1SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data93.867 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6410D-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3400 0.69
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 15.97
+2214%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-3400 1089
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25365
+2229%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-3400 289
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 1277
+342%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-3400 485
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 7418
+1429%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 15.97
Recency 7 September 2011 3 October 2018
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt

A4-3400 has 176.9% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, on the other hand, has a 2214.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3400
A4-3400
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 83 votes

Rate A4-3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 75 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3400 or Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.