Athlon 64 X2 5600+ vs A4-3400

Aggregate performance score

A4-3400
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.68
+19.3%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.57

A4-3400 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5600+ by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3400 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27352832
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.990.61
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date7 September 2011 (13 years ago)December 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-3400 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size228 mm2220 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-3400 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1AM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt89 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3400 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3400 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6410Dno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3400 0.68
+19.3%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 0.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-3400 1086
+20.3%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 903

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-3400 289
+25.1%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 231

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-3400 485
+20.9%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 401

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 0.57
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 89 Watt

A4-3400 has a 19.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 36.9% lower power consumption.

The A4-3400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3400 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3400
A4-3400
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Athlon 64 X2 5600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 83 votes

Rate A4-3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 116 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3400 or Athlon 64 X2 5600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.