Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs A4-3320M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3320M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.54
+28.6%

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ outperforms A4-3320M by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3320M and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29862856
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.130.57
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date20 December 2011 (13 years ago)September 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-3320M and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size228 mm2220 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-3320M and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1AM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3320M and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480Gno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3320M and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3320M and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3320M 0.42
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 0.54
+28.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-3320M 668
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 851
+27.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.54
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 89 Watt

A4-3320M has a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 5200+, on the other hand, has a 28.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3320M in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-3320M is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3320M and Athlon 64 X2 5200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3320M
A4-3320M
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Athlon 64 X2 5200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 9 votes

Rate A4-3320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 313 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3320M or Athlon 64 X2 5200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.