Atom Z3735G vs A4-3310MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3310MX
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.49
+2.1%
Atom Z3735G
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.48

A4-3310MX outperforms Atom Z3735G by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3310MX and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29052912
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.3322.87
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$17

Detailed specifications

A4-3310MX and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size228 mm2112 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A4-3310MX and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1UTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3310MX and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480Gno data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A4-3310MX and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3310MX and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3310MX and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data1 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data5.3 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data646 MHz

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3310MX 0.49
+2.1%
Atom Z3735G 0.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-3310MX 782
+1.3%
Atom Z3735G 772

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A4-3310MX 41.5
Atom Z3735G 37.53
+10.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 0.48
Integrated graphics card 0.67 0.77
Recency 14 June 2011 9 April 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2 Watt

A4-3310MX has a 2.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom Z3735G, on the other hand, has 14.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1650% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A4-3310MX and Atom Z3735G.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3310MX and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3310MX
A4-3310MX
Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 29 votes

Rate A4-3310MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 68 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3310MX or Atom Z3735G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.